Jurnal Kolaboratif Academic Manuscript Submission Standards

The preparation and submission of Jurnal Kolaboratif articles must follow a standardized structure to ensure academic rigor, clarity, and consistency across its publications. Jurnal Kolaboratif regulated general standard structure and formatting requirements is a minimum length of 3500 words and no more than 6000 words. It must be written in Bahasa Indonesia or English using Garamont font, size 12, with 1.15 line spacing throughout the text.

Title

The title should be concise, specific, and informative, reflecting the essence of the community service activity. It must avoid abbreviations and jargon and typically should not exceed 15 words.

Author Information

Each author’s full name should be listed without academic titles. Institutional affiliations should be clearly stated. The corresponding author’s email address must be provided. Where multiple affiliations exist, superscript numbers should be used to link authors to their respective institutions.

Abstract

The abstract provides a concise summary of the community service project. It includes the background, objectives, methods, key outcomes, and the broader impact on the targeted community or institution. It is written in English, comprising no more than 300 words. Keywords (3 to 5 terms) should be included to facilitate indexing and searchability.

Introduction

This section presents the background and context that motivated the community service initiative. It identifies the community partner’s problems or challenges (mitra) and justifies the project’s relevance. It should clearly state the activity’s objectives and, when applicable, include a brief literature review to establish theoretical or empirical support for the intervention.

Method of Implementation

This section details the procedures and strategies used during the execution of the project. It includes: (a) the location and duration of the activity; (b) a description of participants or community partners; (c) the methodology applied (e.g., training, mentoring, focus group discussions, workshops); (d) The steps or stages of the implementation process; (f) Data collection techniques (e.g., observation, interviews, surveys) used to evaluate the outcomes.

Results and Discussion

This part is the article’s core section, showcasing the intervention’s results. It describes as follows: (a) the achievements of the community service activities; (b) the impact on the community in terms of knowledge, skills, attitudes, or behavior change; (c) any qualitative or quantitative improvements observed; (d) challenges encountered during the process and how they were addressed; (e) visual documentation, such as tables, figures, and photographs, to support the analysis.

This section should also include a discussion that interprets the findings, relates them to the objectives, and situates them within the broader context of community development or educational theory.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The conclusion synthesizes the main findings and highlights the significance of the intervention. It should reaffirm the value of the activity for the target community and suggest recommendations for further action, sustainability, or future collaborations. It may also offer insights into how the project could be replicated or scaled.