Efektifitas Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelanggaran Tindak Pidana Pemilu

  • Rizka Amaliatus Syafaah UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA
Abstract views: 304 , PDF downloads: 220
Keywords: election in Indonesia, election crime, penalty, effectiveness

Abstract

In Indonesia, violations of election crimes are not something new. In fact, violations of election crime are almost always found in every election period that take place. During the last election period in 2019 to be exact, there were around 548 findings and reports of election crimes that reached the court examination stage. And in the previous period (2014 election) there were also around 70 findings of criminal violations. Even though there are regulations and sanctions that strictly regulate this matter, these violations still occur. This Article aims to analyze empirically regarding the effectiveness of criminal sanction for violations of election crimes. The research method used in this research is empirical research, where this research focuses on harmony between the reality that occurs in society and existing laws. This study concludes that the effectiveness of criminal sanction as a tool to evercome the occurrence of election crimes cannot be properly practiced if they are not supported by the existence of legal awareness in society, the legal culture that exists in society and a sense of nationalism in order to achieve honest, clean and fair election, fair and not concerned with power and victory alone.

References

Afifah, Wiwik. “Tindak Pidana Pemilu Legislatif Di Indonesia,” n.d., 16.
Ali, Jamilludin. “PARTAI ISLAM DI NEGARA MAYORITAS MUSLIM: STUDI PEMILU PERTAMA INDONESIA.” MAWA’IZH: JURNAL DAKWAH DAN PENGEMBANGAN SOSIAL KEMANUSIAAN 7, no. 1 (June 1, 2016): 150–68. https://doi.org/10.32923/maw.v7i1.609.
Fahmi, Khairul. “Sistem Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemilu.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (May 20, 2016): 264. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1224.
Mulyadi, Dudung. “ANALISIS PENERAPAN BENTUK-BENTUK TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 7, no. 1 (June 20, 2019): 14. https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v7i1.2144.
Ri, Bawaslu. “Laporan Hasil Pengawasan Pemilu Anggota DPR, DPD dan DPRD Tahun 2014,” 2014, 164.
Sastera, I Gusti Bagus Yoga, I Made Minggu Widyantara, and Luh Putu Suryani. “Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemilu di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 1, no. 1 (August 27, 2020): 192–96. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.1.1.2157.192-196.
Surbakti, A. Ramlan. Penanganan pelanggaran pemilu. Cetakan pertama. Seri demokrasi elektoral, buku 15. Kebayoran, Jakarta, Indonesia: Kemitraan Bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan, 2011.
Widianingsih, Yuliani. “DEMOKRASI DAN PEMILU DI INDONESIA:,” n.d., 19.
Yuliawati, Nina. “Efektivitas Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemilu oleh Gakumdu Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum.” Literacy: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial 3, no. 1 (May 28, 2021): 71–89. https://doi.org/10.53489/jis.v3i1.27.
Heru Cahyono, “Pelanggaran Pemilu Legislatif 2004”, Jurnal Penelitian Politik, Vol.1 No.1 (2004), h.11.
KPU Kota Tangerang, “Pengertian Pemilu”, https://bit.ly/3EStzgB.
Pemilu 1955, https://www.kpu.go.id/page/read/8/pemilu-1955.
Pemilu 1971, https://www.kpu.go.id/page/read/9/pemilu-1971.
Pemilu 1999, https://www.kpu.go.id/page/read/11/pemilu-1999.
Pemilu 2004, https://www.kpu.go.id/page/read/1114/pemilu-2004.
Pemilu 2009, https://www.kpu.go.id/page/read/1115/pemilu-2009.
Pemilu 2019, https://www.kpu.go.id/page/read/1113/pemilu-2019.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2023-07-22
How to Cite
Syafaah, R. A. (2023). Efektifitas Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelanggaran Tindak Pidana Pemilu. MASADIR: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 3(01), 572 - 585. https://doi.org/10.33754/masadir.v3i01.582
Section
Articles