Studi Putusan Hakim Pada Perkara Cerai Gugat Nomor 474/Pdt.G/2020/PA.JS Terhadap Hak Nafkah Iddah

  • Fatimatuz Zahro IAIN KEDIRI
  • Salsabila Annisa Rohmah IAIN KEDIRI
Abstrak views: 396 , PDF (English) downloads: 328
Kata Kunci: Judge Consideration, Iddah Living, Divorse Sue

Abstrak

The Panel of Judges in deciding the case that the wife has the right of iddah (a period that must be lived by a woman after the death of her husband or after divorce, during which she cannot marry another man) for her claims against her husband. Therefore, to find out the reason for the non-provenance of nusyuz (a wife unreasonably refusing to comply with the wishes or orders of a legitimate husband) in obtaining the right to live iddah in the divorce law Number 474/Pdt.G/2020/PA.JS based on fiqh and UU Marriage Article 41 of 1974. This issue will be studied using a normative legal approach and a judge's decision study approach. The results of the analysis show that Decision Number 474/Pdt.G/2020/PA.JS concerning the issue of the right to live iddah in a divorce where the Panel of Judges carries out and decides various considerations in deciding the case: the ex-wife or plaintiff gets the right to live iddah from her ex-husband on the basis of considerations The law refers to Article 149 letter (b) of the KHI which basically states that if a marriage breaks up, the husband is obliged to provide a living. including food to eat and clothing to cover his wife's expenses during the period of iddah. Article 41 letter c of the Marriage Law states that the court can require the husband to provide maintenance or establish obligations for the wife.

Referensi

Azhar Bashyir, Ahmad, Hukum Perkawinan Islam (Yogyakarta: U II Press, 1999).

Hassan Ayyub, Syeikh, Fiqih Keluarga (Bandung: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2006).

Idris Ramulyo, Muhammad, Hukum Perkawinan Islam: Suatu Analisis dari UU Nomor. 1 Tahun 1974 dan KHI (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 1999).

Indra, Hasbi, Potret Wanita Sholehah (Jakarta: Permadani, 2005).

Jhoachym Friederich, Carl, filsafat Hukum Dalam Perspektif Historys (Bandung: Nuasa Nusamedia, 2005).

Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Buku I Hukum Perkawinan, BAB XVII bagian ketiga akibat perceraian tentang akibat putusnya perkawinan Pasal 156.

Kutipan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan Nomor. 474/Pdt.G/2020/PA.JS.

Masrokhimin, “Perbandingan antara Hukum Positif dengan Hukum Islam mengenai Pembagian Harta Bersama akibat Perceraian, Jurnal Ius Constutuendum, Volume 1, Nomor 2, Magister Hukum Univ Semarang, 2015.

Pasal 28 Undang-Undang Nomor. 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Rahman Ghazaly, Abd, Fiqih Munakahat (Jakarta: Kencana, 2004).

Rohman, Miftakur. "Kewajiban Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perceraian (Tinjauan Maqa> Shid Syari> Ah)." MIYAH: Jurnal Studi Islam 15.2 (2019).

Rifai, Muhammad, “Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim pada Perspektif Hukum Progesif†(Jakarta: PT. Sinar Grafikq, 2013).

Sheyla Nichlatus Sovia, Abdul Rouf Hasbullah, dkk, Ragam Metode Penelitian Hukum, (Kediri: Lembaga Studi Hukum Pidana, 2022).

Shidartha, Arif, Pengembanan Hukum, Ilmu Hukum, Teori Hukum dan Filsafat (Jakarta: PT Refika Arditama, 2009).

Slamet, Fiqh Munakahat, (Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 1999).

Soejono dan H.Abdurrahman, Metode Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2004).

Subekti, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata (Jakarta: PT Intermasa, 1990).

Sunartho, “Peranan Aktif Hakim pada Bidang Perkara Perdata†(Bandung: Prenada Media Grup, 2015).

Susilo, Budi, Prosedur Cerai Gugat (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia, 2007).

Zuhaili, Wahab, Fiqh Imam Syafi’I (Jakarta: Al-Mahira, 2010).

PlumX Metrics

Diterbitkan
2022-09-02
Bagian
Articles